Everything, it seems, is recyclable nowadays. But is it all worth it? Many people think it should be compulsory to sort your papers and plastics from your other rubbish but does the process do more harm than good? The answer? Very debatable.
It certainly isn't cheap to recycle. It costs millions of pounds to pickup, sort and process all those plastic bottles, papers, aluminum cans and cardboard food boxes we discard.
Putting an accurate figure on the overall cost of recycling is highly unpredictable since each individual council seems to have its own way of dealing with it.
So, do most recycling programs lose money? Of course they do. But then again, so does your run of the mill rubbish bin collection. The question is whether disposal programs involving recycling are more expensive than the old-fashioned variety. To begin with the answer would be undoubtedly, yes. After a few years, however, many find that recycling saves money. Some don't, and eventually those folks may want to reconsider the benefits of their recycle program. The fact remains that recycling in response to an arbitrary government fiat is a useful exercise. Municipal waste disposal historically has been considered an unavoidable expense, with little thought given to whether it could be done more cheaply. Mandatory recycling compels you to give it that little bit of thought: do we really need to throw all this junk away?
Recycling will save unnecessary waste going to landfill sites. Each ton of solid waste that is diverted from disposal, whether recycled or composted, is one less ton of solid waste that requires disposal which means saving land space.
For most objects, it takes less energy to process the recycled materials than it does to use virgin materials. For instance, it takes significantly less energy to recycle paper than it does to create paper from trees. Besides, the energy required to acquire and transport the 'virgin' raw materials from their origins or natural sources is also saved.
Twin Shaft Industrial Shredder designed to be a primary shredder for Industrial waste, MSW, bulky waste, and for all kinds of materials.
It certainly isn't cheap to recycle. It costs millions of pounds to pickup, sort and process all those plastic bottles, papers, aluminum cans and cardboard food boxes we discard.
Putting an accurate figure on the overall cost of recycling is highly unpredictable since each individual council seems to have its own way of dealing with it.
So, do most recycling programs lose money? Of course they do. But then again, so does your run of the mill rubbish bin collection. The question is whether disposal programs involving recycling are more expensive than the old-fashioned variety. To begin with the answer would be undoubtedly, yes. After a few years, however, many find that recycling saves money. Some don't, and eventually those folks may want to reconsider the benefits of their recycle program. The fact remains that recycling in response to an arbitrary government fiat is a useful exercise. Municipal waste disposal historically has been considered an unavoidable expense, with little thought given to whether it could be done more cheaply. Mandatory recycling compels you to give it that little bit of thought: do we really need to throw all this junk away?
So what are the benefits of recycling?
Recycling will save unnecessary waste going to landfill sites. Each ton of solid waste that is diverted from disposal, whether recycled or composted, is one less ton of solid waste that requires disposal which means saving land space.
For most objects, it takes less energy to process the recycled materials than it does to use virgin materials. For instance, it takes significantly less energy to recycle paper than it does to create paper from trees. Besides, the energy required to acquire and transport the 'virgin' raw materials from their origins or natural sources is also saved.
Twin Shaft Industrial Shredder designed to be a primary shredder for Industrial waste, MSW, bulky waste, and for all kinds of materials.
Comments
Post a Comment